It does not matter whether Ahnold will be a good governor or not.
It does not matter whether Ahnold is a Republican, a Democrat, A liberal or a conservative.
It would not have mattered if Cruz had won.
Although this recall, redistricting in Texas, the Clinton Impeachment, and Bush V. Gore were all about Republican power grabs, the real issue is non-partisan and bears examination by anyone who cares at all about a free society, which is to say, it would seem, practically no one in America.
We have, with the success of this recall, proven that election outcomes are negotiable. What this means is that no matter is ever truly settled and that if one side does not like an outcome, it can lobby to reverse it. And although, at the moment, the wins from these seem to be going to Republicans, and that makes a lot of Democrats unhappy, we really need to think about this from a non-partisan point of view.
The question is what happens to democracy when:
a) People with sufficient power and privilege can reverse the outcome and
b) Voters unhappy with the consequences of an election can "take it back."
The outcome of "a" is, of course, oligarchy, which is happening in the US, and will continue to happen until people get pissed off enough to revolt. I regard oligarch as the less dangerous, ultimately, of these, because people WILL get pissed enough to revolt and things will be set right again. It happened after Hoover, and can happen again/
The outcome of "b" is more serious, because it relieves the voters of selecting their candidates with due care and prudence. Part of the outrage at Ahnold's victory is precisely the impression that he was selected because he was a big movie star and therefore cool. But the question is also moot, because, like drugged sheep plugged into the TV we tend to vote for who looks best and who has the slickest ads. We do not exercise, as a nation, the care and prudence we should with regard to our elections and have thus created a government that is a reflection of our worst impulses.
The winners have been winning for years by sneering and condescending, and we are all like the hangers on of bullies, happy to be associated with the power of the bully, but too weak to exercise it ourselves. We would rather side with power than with virtue, and have thereby become the thugs of the international community.
It does not matter whether Ahnold is a Republican, a Democrat, A liberal or a conservative.
It would not have mattered if Cruz had won.
Although this recall, redistricting in Texas, the Clinton Impeachment, and Bush V. Gore were all about Republican power grabs, the real issue is non-partisan and bears examination by anyone who cares at all about a free society, which is to say, it would seem, practically no one in America.
We have, with the success of this recall, proven that election outcomes are negotiable. What this means is that no matter is ever truly settled and that if one side does not like an outcome, it can lobby to reverse it. And although, at the moment, the wins from these seem to be going to Republicans, and that makes a lot of Democrats unhappy, we really need to think about this from a non-partisan point of view.
The question is what happens to democracy when:
a) People with sufficient power and privilege can reverse the outcome and
b) Voters unhappy with the consequences of an election can "take it back."
The outcome of "a" is, of course, oligarchy, which is happening in the US, and will continue to happen until people get pissed off enough to revolt. I regard oligarch as the less dangerous, ultimately, of these, because people WILL get pissed enough to revolt and things will be set right again. It happened after Hoover, and can happen again/
The outcome of "b" is more serious, because it relieves the voters of selecting their candidates with due care and prudence. Part of the outrage at Ahnold's victory is precisely the impression that he was selected because he was a big movie star and therefore cool. But the question is also moot, because, like drugged sheep plugged into the TV we tend to vote for who looks best and who has the slickest ads. We do not exercise, as a nation, the care and prudence we should with regard to our elections and have thus created a government that is a reflection of our worst impulses.
The winners have been winning for years by sneering and condescending, and we are all like the hangers on of bullies, happy to be associated with the power of the bully, but too weak to exercise it ourselves. We would rather side with power than with virtue, and have thereby become the thugs of the international community.