richardf8: (Default)
It does not matter whether Ahnold will be a good governor or not.
It does not matter whether Ahnold is a Republican, a Democrat, A liberal or a conservative.
It would not have mattered if Cruz had won.

Although this recall, redistricting in Texas, the Clinton Impeachment, and Bush V. Gore were all about Republican power grabs, the real issue is non-partisan and bears examination by anyone who cares at all about a free society, which is to say, it would seem, practically no one in America.

We have, with the success of this recall, proven that election outcomes are negotiable. What this means is that no matter is ever truly settled and that if one side does not like an outcome, it can lobby to reverse it. And although, at the moment, the wins from these seem to be going to Republicans, and that makes a lot of Democrats unhappy, we really need to think about this from a non-partisan point of view.

The question is what happens to democracy when:
a) People with sufficient power and privilege can reverse the outcome and
b) Voters unhappy with the consequences of an election can "take it back."

The outcome of "a" is, of course, oligarchy, which is happening in the US, and will continue to happen until people get pissed off enough to revolt. I regard oligarch as the less dangerous, ultimately, of these, because people WILL get pissed enough to revolt and things will be set right again. It happened after Hoover, and can happen again/

The outcome of "b" is more serious, because it relieves the voters of selecting their candidates with due care and prudence. Part of the outrage at Ahnold's victory is precisely the impression that he was selected because he was a big movie star and therefore cool. But the question is also moot, because, like drugged sheep plugged into the TV we tend to vote for who looks best and who has the slickest ads. We do not exercise, as a nation, the care and prudence we should with regard to our elections and have thus created a government that is a reflection of our worst impulses.

The winners have been winning for years by sneering and condescending, and we are all like the hangers on of bullies, happy to be associated with the power of the bully, but too weak to exercise it ourselves. We would rather side with power than with virtue, and have thereby become the thugs of the international community.
richardf8: (Default)
As I consider the aggressiveness with which the RIAA has been attacking P2P networks and their users I am forced to conclude that they really are battling for survival. Sure, they were disturbed when tape recorders came out, but they compromised. Same with DAT (which never materialized into the threat they thought it would). But their policy on this whole computer thingy, and P2P networks in particular is nothing short of draconian. And that is because its not just about their Intellectual Property. It's CERTAINLY not about the artists. Its about a deep down threat to the very foundation of their existence. And anyone who has read Scott McCloud will surely have guessed at my meaning by now.

A P2P Network isn't much more troubling than cassettes when its just listeners exchanging music from listeners. These people will grow up and by legal albums of the pirated music they listened to in their youth. For thirty years that model has worked. But, when its artists exchanging music with listeners, things get truly dangerous. The RIAA becomes superfluous. And the issue of payment that plagues the web-comic world is of less import to musicians who get pittances from the RIAA but get their gravy at live shows. So, if an artist takes a P2P network by storm, and he puts on his web page "hey, I'm playing in Pullman tonight, come see me," he's getting his gravy, but the recording industry isn't getting theirs. Especially if the P2P networks make him popular enough that he can say "hey, I'm playing the Meadowlands tonight," and count on a packed house.

This has record execs quaking in their boots, I expect. And the best way to prevent this scenario is to completely demonize the P2P networks, to create an image of them that causes the listener to say "hey, if I download ANYTHING from here, I might get sued." Then, even if an artist releases a song under the GNU Public License, people will be afraid to download it.

This is also why the record execs don't worry about image. They're fighting to remain the only game in town, and when you're a monopoly, it doesn't matter what people think. But the REAL mark of fear is the recent price reduction on CD's. The RIAA gives enough credence to the threat that P2P networks can pose to their very reason for being that they are not only willing to scare users away with lawsuits, but to lure them away with lower prices. Now that's like publicly wetting your pants!
richardf8: (Default)
In Genesis, there is a story wherein Jacob's daughter Dinah is raped by the local leader, who then seeks to legitimize his actions after the fact by asking for her hand. Jacob and his sons grant this request on the condition that this leader, and all the men in his jurisdiction become circumsised. When the wounds are at their most painful, Two of Jacob's sons, Simeon and Levi, attack, slaying the whole town.

When Jacob chides them, it is not for the wanton death and destruction they have wrought, but rather for the political issues that might arise. Judah and Levi then demand of Jacob "What, were we just supposed to let them get away with raping our sister?"

I find this story very interesting in light of current world events. The fact that Jacob does not condemn them for killing everyone in the town as such suggests that he saw the justice, if not the political expediency, of their actions. But how was it just to kill townspeople who had no hand in the rape? There is only reading I can give, and that is that the people of this town, in consenting to be governed by a rapist, show themselves to be a culture that values rape. The overall message is "If your leader is a menace; deal with him because you may be killed if someone else has to."

Indeed this is the very principle that Bush applied in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Now we Americans are in a strange position. We have a leader who has broken treaties, refused to participate in world efforts to reduce global warming, or participate in the world court. We have a leader who aims to starve our poor and deny them medical care, who holds foreign nationals indefinitely and without charges, and who is doing everything in his power to make the country, even the world, a vast playground of profit for a small circle of family business friends.

How much longer will Bush's unilateralist rape of the world, whether economic, environmental, or military, be tolerated? How much time do we have until others in the world community determine that it is time we were liberated from the Bush regime, and how many of us will survive such a liberation? How much happier would Dinah have been, had the people in whose land she stayed remembered, as we must today, that Regime Change Begins at Home?
richardf8: (Default)
I wrote this piece back in February, before the war-noises became the war. Those of you who pay attention to GPF's forum might remember me posting it there. Sadly, as I look at it today and contemplate the way things are unfolding there and at home, I find it remains as current today as it was six months ago (except that Hussein is no longer on the world stage, though he may yet be in the wings). So I'm going to present it here.

Hussein and Bush: Doppelgangers?
by Rich Furman

Saddam Hussein is a bad man. Elections in his country are a mockery of democratic process, he tortures his people, starving them while he reserves wealth for his elite, and he has imperial dreams that include bringing Israel under Iraqi control. While any connections he has with Al-Qaeda are specious at best, it is an undisputed fact that he funds terror campaigns in Israel. He assures suicide bombers that their families will taken care of after they are gone. So, on an Arab Street where poverty fuels resentment and desperation, suicide bombers perform terroristic acts for reasons that may be more Willy Lomanesque than Osama Bin Laden-esque. He is a bad man and for all these reasons should have been removed from power long ago.

Thus, I should applaud W.’s campaign for regime change, yet I don’t. I am concerned that W.’s motivation is less about making Iraq more like the U.S. than it is about making the U.S. more like Iraq. My theory is that W. looks at Saddam and suffers from a case of regime-envy. The Bush family has already given him a good start. His brother in Florida, and his father’s appointee to the Supreme Court (Clarence “Oreo Houseboy” Thomas) have made a mockery of democratic process. Evidence is growing that prisoners are being tortured . His economic policies fuel a growing disparity between rich and poor, and through a combination of treaty defections, coercive foreign policy, and a willingness to make the International Community buy what we break (i.e. Afghanistan), we have now achieved Iraq’s popularity and credibility in the worlds eyes.

Bush learned a lot from 9/11. He learned that in the wake of a terrorist event, Congress rolls over and plays dead, giving him a free hand to do whatever he wants to the Bill of Rights. How to apply this lesson? March into Iraq and use the inevitable terrorist response to further increase surveillance, reduce freedom of movement, and move us closer to a police-state. He learned that even the threat of terror can make the American People obey the most ludicrous orders. This time the panacea was Duct Tape and sheeting. He also learned that people who are poor enough, given something to blame will gladly kill themselves to kill it. He learned this from Osama, but could just as easily have learned it from Hitler. And hence we have deficit spending, tax cuts for the wealthy, cuts in education spending, the decimation of health-care for the poor, and the gutting of even the meager workplace protections left intact by Reagan.

Our President has a vision. He wants to create a U.S. Street that is similar enough to the Arab Street that he, like Osama, can raise an army of the damned to . . . to . . . I’m almost afraid to ask. Perhaps after we have occupied Iraq and Iran and nuked North Korea, we’ll start working on the next Axis of Evil: France, Germany and Russia.
richardf8: (Default)
Gas Prices are going up again, so another war with some middle eastern country can't be far away. I have been thinking about putting together a special "Maudlin, Slit-Your-Wrists, George W. Bush, anti- war" mix. Here are the songs I'm thinking of including so far:

Motorhead - 1916
Pink Floyd - When the Tigers Broke Free
The Pogues - (No More I'll Go) Waltzing Matilda (they do a better job with it than Eric Bogle)
Billy Bragg - My Youngest Son Came Home Today
Leonard Cohen - The Story of Isaac
Buffy Saint Marie - The Universal Soldier
Peter, Paul and Mary - Greenwood

Anyone have any other suggestions?
richardf8: (Default)
I was toying with using this in a strip, but its ultimately too long to work there. So, inspired by Psychic Friends Network, I am pleased to present:

Toxic Friends Network
Are you feeling a little too full of yourself?

Are you afraid of success, but find nothing standing in its way?

Are you nostalgic for those warm fuzzy feelings of guilt and shame your mother used to give you?

Call the Toxic Friends Hotline for all the lambasting, browbeating, and denigration that is missing from your life.

Listen to what Famous Biblical Figure Job has to say about "Toxic Friends"

"When God placed me at Satan's mercy, Toxic Friends sent one of its 'Blame Teams' right to my house. After being blamed, accused, browbeaten and lambasted for interminable days, I figured 'better God should strike me down than I should have to listen to these people any longer.' They got me off my butt, and if it weren't for them, I might still be facing unsightly boils, and might never have gotten my family back. I owe it all to Toxic Friends"

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 06:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios