And speaking of deep voices... I speak a bit of Dragon, for obvious reasons. Especially when the dragon in question is making pie, for then he is (or should be) speaking in a manner that has become second nature to me.
"No, I won't, and if you were to try Then I will not provide you any pie."
There is not much air time in this mode (http://www.ozyandmillie.org/d/20070125.html), and under the circumstances, you'd need to offer it to the author as an anonymous gift. You have my permission to do so. He's not fond of me, I think, but that is his choice. ];-)
I'm afraid he's less fond of me than of you. But I am on good terms with some who are on good terms with him, so maybe he can receive your suggestion thirdhand.
Might I say, I'm rather surprised and impressed that you replied to such an old comment. It's not like you have only a handful of entries and responsive readers.
Might I say, I'm rather surprised and impressed that you replied to such an old comment.
My filing system is pretty good. This is the earliest comment I have from you, and it happens that you mentioned voice -- which was the bit I was thinking about.
I thought I knew which entry you were writing about -- but obviously I was wrong. We're in someone else's LJ after all. (Hello, richardf8.)
As it happens, you're both acquainted with David Simpson. The snippet is obviously no big deal; a moment's amusement, and no more. If it is of use to him, he's welcome to it.
Our host may want to kill this bit of thread (But wait to do so till conversing ends) His part was unintended, and I dread To get him deep in trouble with his friends...
This has been fun to watch, if a bit puzzling. Haven't seen your dragon icon in AGES and it is the one I most think of as you.
This thread is not something worth killing - I prefer not to revise the history of the comment trail, though I will occasionally hide a comment that I think could expose me legally.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 02:19 am (UTC)But David Prowse is four inches taller than I am -- not to mention. ];-)
Mr. Kellogg would need to let his hair grow a bit. ];-)
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 04:07 am (UTC)Mr. Kellogg would need to let his hair grow a bit.
Eh, nothing a trip to any mall Cinnabon can't cure!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 07:08 pm (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:36 pm (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/level_head/21463.html
Everyone seems to be able to recognize me on the phone, but my voice is too fuzzy for my liking. ];-)
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:31 pm (UTC)"No, I won't, and if you were to try
Then I will not provide you any pie."
There is not much air time in this mode (http://www.ozyandmillie.org/d/20070125.html), and under the circumstances, you'd need to offer it to the author as an anonymous gift. You have my permission to do so. He's not fond of me, I think, but that is his choice. ];-)
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:56 pm (UTC)Might I say, I'm rather surprised and impressed that you replied to such an old comment. It's not like you have only a handful of entries and responsive readers.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 10:45 pm (UTC)My filing system is pretty good. This is the earliest comment I have from you, and it happens that you mentioned voice -- which was the bit I was thinking about.
I thought I knew which entry you were writing about -- but obviously I was wrong. We're in someone else's LJ after all. (Hello,
As it happens, you're both acquainted with David Simpson. The snippet is obviously no big deal; a moment's amusement, and no more. If it is of use to him, he's welcome to it.
Our host may want to kill this bit of thread
(But wait to do so till conversing ends)
His part was unintended, and I dread
To get him deep in trouble with his friends...
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:29 am (UTC)This thread is not something worth killing - I prefer not to revise the history of the comment trail, though I will occasionally hide a comment that I think could expose me legally.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:50 am (UTC)The exposure would be social, not legal.
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:52 am (UTC)I'm usually quicker on the uptake than two-plus years.
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:45 am (UTC)....oh, yeah... but when do I get the girl?
:D
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 07:15 pm (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2004-11-14 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 07:16 pm (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
*wags!*
Date: 2004-11-14 08:30 am (UTC)Re: *wags!*
Date: 2004-11-16 07:36 pm (UTC)("While we're happy, let's party!")
===|==============/ Level Head