richardf8: (Default)
[personal profile] richardf8
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32557

In the above MeFi post, the writer bemoans the fact that Clinton was impeached for nookie while Bush, who arguably led us to war under false pretenses is not being impeached.

Of course, Clinton was not impeached for the nookie. He was impeached for the perjury. Bush is not likely to make the same mistake. Hence his refusal to testify under oath before the 9/11 commission.

The lesson learned: Never, ever, ever say anything under oath. You have a right not to incriminate yourself, after all. It's in the constitution. And if you're rich and powerful, you get the full protection of the constitution. You just have to be cunning enough to use it.

Date: 2004-04-18 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
I wonder if Bush is planning to admit a lie or mistake (for the first time) if he's not in the lead when November approaches. It boosted Clinton's popularity. DO NOT LET EITHER OF THEM SEE THIS!

"Never, ever, ever say anything under oath"? How about "Say only the truth under oath"? Even if embarrassing, it won't get you a perjury charge.

Then again, I've taken interest in Matthew 5:34, where Jesus elaborates on the commandment against false swearing by telling people not to swear at all. Someone might use the passage to refuse getting sworn in at court.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 11:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios