The Imus Scandal, etc.
Apr. 12th, 2007 08:19 amSounds like Imus may have lost his show if I heard the news right this morning.
That's fine, he'll find another venue.
I cannot help but note that its another in a series of similar scandals, whether of racism, anti-semitism, or misogyny.
These things aren't happening because Howard Stern, Don Imus, or Mel Gibson, or whomever are bad people. These things are happening because there is a zeitgeist that eats it up, because there is an audience that is receptive to, and even validated by it.
And when Don Imus finds a new venue it will be because of this infamy, not in spite of it, and the market it appeals to will be even more receptive to a diet of hate. So much so that Imus may find himself in the position of having to ratchet up the volume in order to retain them.
Is this a desirable outcome?
And more pressing: what is this zeitgeist that these speech acts validate it and do we REALLY think we can staunch it by suppression? Sure we can put a finger in the dam where Imus is, but that only increases the flow elsewhere, and I'm not sure who's going to put a finger in Ann Coulter.
When we hear speech we do not like, we are to apt, I think to react with outrage and punish, punish, punish. That makes martyrs, and feeds the perception of oppression held by those who regard their prejudices and perceptions as normative.
I would keep Imus on the air. But I would shuffle McGuirk off elsewhere, and pair Imus with, say, Jeannene Garofalo, a liberal humorist who will only be too happy to call him on his shit in a way that makes him look like a jerk.
Come on - this is Defense Against the Dark Arts 101, guys. The way to vanquish a boggart is to make it look ridiculous.
That's fine, he'll find another venue.
I cannot help but note that its another in a series of similar scandals, whether of racism, anti-semitism, or misogyny.
These things aren't happening because Howard Stern, Don Imus, or Mel Gibson, or whomever are bad people. These things are happening because there is a zeitgeist that eats it up, because there is an audience that is receptive to, and even validated by it.
And when Don Imus finds a new venue it will be because of this infamy, not in spite of it, and the market it appeals to will be even more receptive to a diet of hate. So much so that Imus may find himself in the position of having to ratchet up the volume in order to retain them.
Is this a desirable outcome?
And more pressing: what is this zeitgeist that these speech acts validate it and do we REALLY think we can staunch it by suppression? Sure we can put a finger in the dam where Imus is, but that only increases the flow elsewhere, and I'm not sure who's going to put a finger in Ann Coulter.
When we hear speech we do not like, we are to apt, I think to react with outrage and punish, punish, punish. That makes martyrs, and feeds the perception of oppression held by those who regard their prejudices and perceptions as normative.
I would keep Imus on the air. But I would shuffle McGuirk off elsewhere, and pair Imus with, say, Jeannene Garofalo, a liberal humorist who will only be too happy to call him on his shit in a way that makes him look like a jerk.
Come on - this is Defense Against the Dark Arts 101, guys. The way to vanquish a boggart is to make it look ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 01:53 pm (UTC)If there was a market for disemboweling puppies onscreen, I'm sure a few corporations would look the other way for the sake of exploiting that market.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 02:34 pm (UTC)Imus is merely repeating the mistake of the Greaseman 8-9 years ago (wow, that long?). The zeitgeist has been around a while, but perhaps it has intensified, at least in the left-wing community.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 03:04 pm (UTC)People should tell advertisers "hey, if you're going to pay a racist to advertise your product, I don't want to buy it." That's the proper way of getting someone off the air, speaking with your wallet.
As for people saying that Imus is just a small part of the problem, I agree whole-heartedly... but we shouldn't let him slide just because we're having difficulty taking down the others. Se should hold them all accountable for their words, including some of the race-baiters that are Imus' loudest critics (Sharpton, Jackson)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 01:04 am (UTC)And since I haven't heard Stern's show since he moved to Sirius, I don't know if he's amped up the misogyny or what, but I can tell you, that's one of the main reasons I never enjoyed his show.
As for Ann Coulter, she always falls back on the ol' "grow a sense of humor" excuse if she makes a comment that is offensive. But, they keep booking her because she sells out the tickets.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 01:02 pm (UTC)But will people really listen?