thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-09-10 03:52 pm

Charlie Kirk assassinated at Utah university, aged 31

Kirk, a conservative activist, was the founder of Turning Point USA and a regular speaker at colleges and universities. He would challenge people to debates and was good at turning said debates to conservative talking points.

The shooting happened not long after his talk began, his security rushed him to a hospital where he was later pronounced dead. The campus, Utah Valley University in Orem, went into lock-down and shelter in place. While one arrest was made on-site, that person was later released. The assassin is still at large at this time.

POTUS has ordered flags at the White House to half-mast and Mike Johnson a moment of silence in the House of Reps.

It is reported that the shooter was on the roof of a near-by building, about 200' away.

Tots and pears. It's hard for me to say that our political process should not devolve into violence when the party in power incites violence daily.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/live/charlie-kirk-shooting-live-updates-conservative-activist-shot-at-utah-valley-university-event-school-says-190606372.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/live-updates-shooting-charlie-kirk-event-utah-rcna230437
cellio: (Default)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2025-09-09 04:37 pm
Entry tags:

September, still

The other day, I saw something cute and reposted it on Mastodon:

Overheard, and for Internet old-timers: "Today is the 11,691st day of September 1993".

Someone responded to tell me that Debian has the sdate command "which keeps track for all of us".

I laughed. And then I found that there are also online calculators, for people who don't use Debian.

I am amused, even if -- or perhaps because -- those of us who remember the September that never ended are now a very small minority of the online population. Back then people were frustrated; today it's quirky history. Whatever your online community is -- Usenet, mailing lists, Twitter, Reddit, Dreamwidth, Stack Overflow, whatever -- it's going to change just from the people using it, let alone technology and companies. Don't get too comfortable.

cellio: (Default)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2025-09-09 04:27 pm
Entry tags:

strange credit-card pitch

I've had my Visa card for a very long time (decades). I've been happy with the provider, and the few times I needed the weight of Visa behind a dispute, they came through. No fuss, just like I want a credit card to be.

A few months ago they started sending me email to invite me to add another authorized user to my card, suggesting it as a safety net (so if something happens to me, someone else can administer my account). Maybe that appeals to someone, but I'm not interested so I ignored it. More recently they have been offering minor inducements (a one-time small credit) to do this, and that makes me wonder what their real goal is.

If this is merely a service they offer for peace of mind, the peace of mind is the inducement and nothing else is needed. That they are trying to entice people to do it means there's some other motivation that benefits them more directly. I'm assuming this is not a way to add your minor children so they can more easily make in-app purchases or whatever the kids are doing these days -- and anyway, unless they're giving you a way to throttle spending from other users, that would be a very bad idea.

The only thing I can come up with is that this is a way for people with bad credit scores to get access to credit cards. They aren't going to issue cards to such folks directly, but if they can get you to add your deadbeat cousin with a terrible credit rating (to "help" your family member), then the credit-card company gets more transactions and thus more transaction fees at very low risk to them. They know an existing customer who'd like to keep a good credit rating is on the hook for the charges; they're going to get paid. This might be in Visa's interest, but how is it in mine? It's not, which is presumably why they're trying to buy folks off.

Have I missed some benign reason for them to push this scheme?

(Still not doing it, but curious.)

thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-09-07 12:11 pm
Entry tags:

Finland creates "sand battery" in soapstone for storing thermal energy from renewable sources

This is really cool.

In the town of Pornainen, they've built a 13 meter tall battery of "low-grade" sand that they warm-up to 450 degrees C - that 842 degrees F! - and it can hold that temperatures for weeks if not months, then they can use the hot air from it to heat the town's local heating network!

I think that's a pretty awesome use. They're using excess energy generated by renewable sources - free energy - to heat up the sand, then piping it around town. The former method to warm up the town was a woodchip furnace plant, clearly they're drastically cutting their CO2 footprint with this. And by using low-grade sand, their costs are pretty low.

But let's talk about sand for a minute. Businesses are literally dredging up ocean floors for sand to make more concrete. And you can't recover it from broken-up concrete when buildings are demolished. Now, to use sand to make a thermal battery I think is a worthwhile endeavor. I just wish they'd work out better ways to repurpose and recycle existing demolished concrete.

https://www.the-independent.com/tech/sand-battery-renewable-energy-finland-b2818348.html

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/09/06/027211/a-very-finnish-thing-huge-sand-battery-starts-storing-wind-energy-in-soapstone
deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg ([personal profile] deckardcanine) wrote2025-09-06 08:15 pm

This Poem Is Not Yet Rated

For many years, I used to think
That “fetish” was the same as “kink.”
They both refer to wants or acts
To bring excitement to the max.
The key distinction: Kinks are just
A bonus; fetishes, a “must.”
And that is all I care to say
On this specific point. Good day.
thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-09-06 10:21 am

Anthropic AI pays $1.5b to settlement fund in author's litigation case

To briefly recap, a group of authors sued the AI company Anthropic for pirating their books off the internet through illegal downloads and incorporating it into their AI data training sets, alleging piracy, copyright violation and theft. Which it clearly was. In an interesting twist, Anthropic then went out and bought quite literally tons of books, cut the spines off of them, scanned the pages, then trashed the then-scanned books, claiming the rights of first-ownership that they could do what they wanted to with the books.

But that was a bit of ex post facto reasoning: they'd already committed the crime of stealing the contents of the books, subsequently buying them after having already incorporated the contents into the datasets doesn't make it all better.

From the article: "In June, U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic’s use of the books in training models was “exceedingly transformative,” one of the factors courts have used in determining whether the use of protected works without authorization was a legal “fair use.” His decision was the first major decision that weighed the fair use question in generative AI systems.

Yet Alsup also ruled that Anthropic had to face a trial on the question of whether it is liable for downloading millions of pirated books in digital form off the internet, something it had to do in order to train its models for its AI service Claude. The books were obtained from datasets Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror.

“That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages,” the judge wrote.
(emphasis mine)

The piracy issue was a huge one. in court, Anthropic IT staff testified that they used bit torrent software to download vast troves of books at the direction of management. The problem is with bit torrent. Bit torrent uses "seeds". When you download a file, you are downloading small pieces of it from many clients and servers from around the world. And your computer becomes one such piece of this network and starts serving up pieces of the files that you've downloaded to people requesting those files.

As a general rule, companies don't go after people downloading pirated material if they're not downloading it 24/7/365. But they do go after people providing pirated material! And if you use bit torrent software to download pirated material, you're downloading AND uploading material that shouldn't be shared! Eventually they're going to notice you and their attorneys are going to dust off their giant mallets of loving correction.

I've used bit torrent software before. But what I use it for is downloading books that I've bought from Humble Bundle where I've got 20 large PDF books to download, it's the only practical way to do it even when I have a fairly fast fiberoptic internet connection. And I leave my torrent connection open so other people who've bought the bundle can benefit from my PC having those books on it.

I have no idea how many books Anthropic downloaded. It's quite possible that Anthropic has no absolute count as to how many books they downloaded. And that's probably why they agreed to this settlement. They wanted to avoid a damages trial which would dig into exactly how many books they had stolen.

And let's take that one step further. This would have branded them - in court! - as the world's largest piracy case. EVER. That's one thing that they definitely did not want to be branded with. A great big Scarlet P that they would wear forever. Much better to pay $1.5 billion and be rid of it.

Two additional things about this of interest. First, the settlement only covers their misdeeds through August 25. If they are found to have conducted any additional piracy after this date, then all the court processes could get reset and everything starts over again. Second, and this is the most significant part: "Anthropic also has agreed to destroy the datasets used in its models."

I have no idea what this fully means. Since they bought all these books and scanned them, they presumably have an even better dataset on standby once this pirated set is destroyed, so it shouldn't affect them much. Perhaps this is purely a symbolic victory, but it is an important one. We shall see.

https://deadline.com/2025/09/anthropic-ai-lawsuit-settlement-1-5-billion-1236509423/

https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/09/05/1941245/anthropic-agrees-to-pay-record-15-billion-to-settle-authors-ai-lawsuit
thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-09-06 10:05 am
Entry tags:

America's first sodium-ion battery maker folds: can't get add'l backing, not getting enough sales

Natron had been trying to raise $1.4b in funding to build a mega-factory in North Carolina that would have employed 1,000 people. It failed. Sales for its industrial sodium-ion batteries were not enough to keep the 13-year old company in the black, and an excellent tech company is no more.

Sodium-ion batteries have some great tech advantages over lithium-ion. Most importantly, they don't catch on fire as easily. They don't use lithium, so they're less expensive and don't consume a rare earth mineral. Sodium is much more readily available and cheaper to produce. They also don't use copper, a somewhat rare mineral, and using aluminum instead of copper makes for a much lighter battery.

However, sodium-ion has a lower energy density than lithium-ion, which makes it a bit less desirable than LIon. Whether this disadvantage can be overcome in time, we shall see.

I have no idea if this company's products were targeted for the EV market, or just for industrial use.

https://www.wral.com/story/battery-maker-natron-closes-shop-killing-plans-for-1-000-jobs-in-north-carolina/22144342/

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/09/05/2126200/americas-first-sodium-ion-battery-manufacturer-ceases-operations
deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg ([personal profile] deckardcanine) wrote2025-09-03 08:01 pm

Book Review: First Among Sequels

Despite the title's implication, this is the fifth Thursday Next novel, not the second. That said, it reportedly kicks off a second series. While published in 2007, only 2 years after the previous entry, it's set 14 years later, in 2002.

Cut for length )

My next read is A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher, whom I recently discovered is Ursula Vernon. I've been enjoying her Hamster Princess kid lit (not reviewed here), so now I'll try a darker fairy tale take.
thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-08-31 10:54 am
Entry tags:

In a study, wearing rose scent for ONE MONTH increased growth in the brain's gray matter!

Well, this is kinda interesting! It's hard to say at the moment what the significance of it is, though. This is what I love about medicine: they discover one thing, only for it to prove how little we know about the body. "Hey! We know how to stimulate growth of gray matter! But we don't know why or if it's good for anything...." But hey, it's science, and science builds upon science, so it's all good.

From the article: "Researchers from Kyoto University and the University of Tsukuba in Japan asked 28 women to wear a specific rose scent oil on their clothing for a month, with another 22 volunteers enlisted as controls who put on plain water instead. (and that's not entirely accurate: 29 women wore the scent, but one was unable to do the post-MRI)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans showed boosts in the gray matter volume of the rose scent participants.

While an increase in brain volume doesn't necessarily translate into more thinking power, the findings could have implications for neurodegenerative conditions such as dementia."


There was no change in the areas of the brain where smell or emotions were processed, which is interesting. But "significantly more gray matter in the posterior cingulate cortex or PCC (linked to memory and association)."

They don't know why this change is happening. One thought put forth is that the rose scent is acting as an irritant, which is interesting. I'm hoping they do longer term studies to see if it actually affects dementia-related illnesses! Of course, I'd also like to see this study replicated using men. It's the same problem of most medical studies using only men because they don't want to have to bother with accommodating women's hormonal variances, it's just so yucky and unpredictable! Then they proclaim that everything applies equally to all women, and they just don't.

The scent-wearing group were 29 participants aged 41–69 years, the control group 22 participants aged 41–65 years.

https://www.sciencealert.com/smelling-this-one-specific-scent-can-boost-the-brains-gray-matter

The full paper is currently available at
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923024000297?via%3Dihub

If it becomes restricted, I downloaded the PDF and would be happy to supply it.
thewayne: (Default)
The Wayne ([personal profile] thewayne) wrote2025-08-30 08:20 pm
Entry tags:

"It was great when it all began!" 50 years of The Rocky Horror Picture Show!

My, my, how time flies! But fly it does, and October will see the release of a 4K HDR box set of the newly-restored movie that will have TWO documentaries!

A lot of the movie cast is still with us, though we lost Meatloaf a few years back. Interestingly, the movie was not a success in its initial run, it wasn't until the midnight circuit picked it up and the shadow casting and other fun started and it took on a life of its own that it really became a success. According to the article, RHPS may be the origin of cos-play!

I'll definitely be ordering this when it comes out. As it happens, I listened to the soundtrack just a week or so ago.

https://arstechnica.com/culture/2025/08/celebrating-50-years-of-the-rocky-horror-picture-show/
deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg ([personal profile] deckardcanine) wrote2025-08-30 06:11 pm

Avalanches

In fiction, many people cause an avalanche with shouts.
It really can’t be done, beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Our strongest voices offer maybe two pascals of pressure,
At least a hundred times too small for causes we can measure.
In theory, it could happen with a supersonic boom,
But that has never been confirmed. Some scientists assume
That avalanches triggered by a lower-flying jet
Respond to wind or shock waves more than sound (we don’t know yet).
They happen far more often with a snowmobile or skis,
So when you’re on a snowy peak, proceed with caution please.