Well, the fact that the proposal would require a supermajority in both houses to override a supreme court ruling is something of a small comfort.
However, the language with which this bill has been introduced, and the reasons given for its introduction strike me as being designed to find a way to sacrifice individual freedoms protected by the courts on the altar of the tyranny of the majority.
Re: Should Congress be able to override the Presidential Veto?
However, the language with which this bill has been introduced, and the reasons given for its introduction strike me as being designed to find a way to sacrifice individual freedoms protected by the courts on the altar of the tyranny of the majority.