well I'd have to say I disagree with you heavily when it comes to Kucinich. I like his positions. I like what he says and I like him. I voted for him before and I will again. But thats me.
The problem with Gravel, at least from my stand point, is that during the debates he came off as the anti-war rabble rouser. A bit of a spoiler and too focused on that one issue. Or that is the way it seemed to me. Also don't discount the vacuous nature of the voters and the fact that he is the oldest candidate running for the Democratic Party ticket.
I'm also an Edwards fan. After Kucinich he seemed to have the best positions on labor and health care and besides he's put out more position papers then any other candidate I respect that... ^.^ Seemed like a good match to me.
no subject
The problem with Gravel, at least from my stand point, is that during the debates he came off as the anti-war rabble rouser. A bit of a spoiler and too focused on that one issue. Or that is the way it seemed to me. Also don't discount the vacuous nature of the voters and the fact that he is the oldest candidate running for the Democratic Party ticket.
I'm also an Edwards fan. After Kucinich he seemed to have the best positions on labor and health care and besides he's put out more position papers then any other candidate I respect that... ^.^ Seemed like a good match to me.